Tahap Pencapaian Aras Kognitif Pelajar Kursus Penghayatan Etika dan Peradaban ke Arah Melahirkan Modal Insan Berpengetahuan(University Students’ Cognitive Level in the ‘Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization’ Course Towards Producing Knowledgeable Human
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Negara amat memerlukan modal insan yang bukan hanya mampu berfikir secara kreatif dan kritis tetapi juga berpengetahuan luas serta cakna dengan isu semasa. Justeru, dalam usaha untuk menjadi pelajar yang mempunyai kemahiran kognitif yang tinggi, mereka bukan hanya mencedok ilmu yang diajar sewaktu kelas semata-mata tetapi perlu membuat pembacaan yang lebih meluas dalam pelbagai aspek termasuk isu-isu semasa dalam dan luar negara. Kertas ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap domain yang dicapai oleh para pelajar yang mengambil kursus Penghayatan Etika dan Peradaban sebagai kursus teras universiti di UMT. Hasil pembelajaran kursus menyasarkan para pelajar dapat menguasai aras Pengetahuan (K1) dan Pemahaman (K2) bagi LO Knowledge and Understanding. Kajian ini melibatkan 1,430 orang pelajar tahun 1 dari pelbagai program pengajian di UMT. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah kajian kualitatif dengan menggunakan protokol analisis dokumen dan data jawapan ujian pelajar semasa sesi pembelajaran berlangsung pada semester 2, 2021/2022. Hasil kajian mendapati tahap pencapaian domain kognitif bagi aras K2 Pemahaman para pelajar didapati lebih rendah berbanding aras K1 Pengetahuan. Aras K2 Pemahaman dalam kalangan pelajar berada pada tahap memuaskan disebabkan oleh sikap kurang cakna dalam kalangan para pelajar tentang isu-isu semasa dalam konteks etika dan peradaban.
Kata Kunci: domain kognitif; modal insan; pencapaian pelajar
ABSTRACT
The country is in need of human capital that can think creatively and critically as well as possessing extensive knowledge in their field of studies and current issues. In order to dominate high cognitive skills, students must not only depend on the knowledge taught during the class alone but they need to read broadly. This paper aims to identify the cognitive domain level achieved by students who took the Appreciation of Ethics and Civilization course as a core university course at Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT). The course learning outcomes ensure students are able to master two cognitive levels, namely, Knowledge (C1) and Comprehension (C2). The study involved 1,430 Year 1 students from various programs of studies. This study uses a qualitative research method by using document analysis protocol. The results of the study found that the level of cognitive domain achieved for Comprehension (C2) was lower than the C1. Learners’ achievements in comprehension (C2) in the two tests were at satisfactory level due to the lack of awareness among students about current issues in the context of ethics and civilization.
Keywords: cognitive domain; human capital; student achievement
Downloads
References
A. Lopes, L. Babo, J. Azevedo & C. Torres. (2010) Multiple –Choice Tests – a tool in assessing knowledge in 4th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 8-10 March, 2010 (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/47136087.pdf)
Abu Bakar Nordin dan Ikhsan Othman. (2003). Falsafah Pendidikan dan Kurikulum, m/s: 30-35. Kuala Lumpur: Quantum Books.
Arsaythamby Veloo (2011). Keupayaan Teori dan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran dalam Pembelajaran in Journal of Governance and Development, vol.7, pp.8 -15) (http://repo.uum.edu.my/11915/1/9.pdf)
Dora, M.T., Kudus, N., Hassan, M.A. & Ali, R. (2008). Kemahiran Insaniah: 7 Kompetensi Unggul Mahasiswa. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka : Penerbit Universiti UTEM.
Irfan Hyder & Shelina Bhamani. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain) in Higher Education Settings: Reflection Brief in Journal of Education and Educational Development. Vol.3, no.2, December 2016, pp. 288 – 300 (http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1039)
Ismahdi Hj. Ismail. (2008). Pendekatan Agama Perlu Dititikberatkan Dalam Modal Insan, Asnaf 1/2008, m/s: 15. Shah Alam: Lembaga Zakat Selangor.
Laporan Separuh Penggal, Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas. (2018). Unit Perancangan Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
Maisarah Ishak & Abdul Rahim Zumrah. (2008). Pendidikan Asas Pembangunan Modal Insan. PROSIDING PERKEM III, JILID 1 (2008) 327 – 331.
Muhammad Tufail Chandio, Saima Murtaza Pandhiani & Rabia Iqbal. (2016) Bloom’s Taxanomy: Improving Assessment and Teaching-Learning Process in Journal of Education and Educational Development. Vol.3, no.2, December 2016, pp. 2003-2021. (https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1161460)
Nazlia Omar, Syahidah Sufi Haris, Rosilah Hassan, Haslina Arshad, Masura Rahmat, Noor Faridatul Ainun Zainal & Rozli Zulkifli. (2011) Automated Analysis of Exam Questions according to Bloom’s Taxonomy in Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59 (2012) 297-303 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812037263
Nurul Haerani Mohamad & Ahmad bin Esa. (2012). Pembangunan Modal Insan Holistik Pelajar Menerusi Aktiviti Kokurikulum Politeknik. Johor: UTHM
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM) 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah) dan PPPM 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi).
Wilayat Bibi Khan & Hafiz Muhammad Inamullah. (2011) A Study of Low-order and Higher-order Questions at Secondary Level in Asian Social Science. Vol.7, no.9, September 2011, 149 -157. (http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/10309)
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
